The question of whether the Mayo Clinic has reviewed or endorsed Balance of Nature supplements is one of the most searched queries by consumers today. As of December 2025, the short answer is no: the Mayo Clinic does not offer a direct review or endorsement of Balance of Nature, adhering to its long-standing policy of not endorsing specific commercial products or companies. However, the conversation around this popular supplement has been dramatically overshadowed by far more critical and recent developments, including federal court orders and long-standing regulatory issues with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

This comprehensive, up-to-date analysis cuts through the marketing to provide the freshest information on Balance of Nature's efficacy, ingredients, and, most importantly, the significant legal and regulatory challenges that have dominated headlines throughout 2024 and 2025, which should be the primary concern for any potential customer.

The Truth Behind the "Mayo Clinic" Review Claim

The search query "Balance of Nature reviews Mayo Clinic" is extremely popular, often suggesting an expectation of a formal endorsement or evaluation from the highly respected medical institution. It is crucial for consumers to understand the institutional policy on this matter.

Mayo Clinic's Non-Endorsement Policy

• No Direct Endorsement: The Mayo Clinic, as a non-profit academic medical center, maintains a strict policy against endorsing specific commercial products, including dietary supplements like Balance of Nature.
• Focus on Whole Foods: While the Mayo Clinic does not review the supplement, its general health advice consistently emphasizes the importance of a well-balanced diet rich in whole fruits, vegetables, and whole grains as the primary source of nutrition.
• General Supplement Guidance: The institution advises that nutritional supplements are designed to *supplement* a diet, not replace it, and should be discussed with a healthcare provider, especially for individuals with existing conditions.

Any marketing or implication that suggests a direct review or endorsement by the Mayo Clinic is misleading. The institution’s credibility is often inadvertently invoked by consumers searching for the most authoritative health information available.

The 2024/2025 Legal Storm: FDA Warnings and Court Orders

The most pressing and up-to-date information regarding Balance of Nature is not a positive review, but a series of major regulatory and legal actions. These developments stem from the company's marketing claims and manufacturing practices.

Federal Court Order to Halt Sales

In a significant legal action that has continued to evolve into 2025, a federal court in Utah issued a consent decree ordering the company and its executives to halt the production and sales of its dietary supplements until they demonstrate full compliance with federal law and the FDA's Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) regulations. This order came after repeated violations and a failure to meet required standards.

Unapproved Disease-Treatment Claims

The primary issue that triggered the FDA's scrutiny, dating back to a 2019 Warning Letter and culminating in the recent court actions, was the company's advertising. Balance of Nature was accused of making unapproved claims that its products could be used to diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent serious diseases, effectively marketing them as unapproved new drugs.

Specific Disease Claims Cited in FDA Actions:

• Cancer
• Diabetes
• Multiple Sclerosis
• Heart Disease
• Other serious illnesses

The FDA emphasized that it has not approved Balance of Nature products for any therapeutic use, making these claims illegal under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

Ongoing Class Action Lawsuits

As of late 2024 and into 2025, the company continues to face class action lawsuits alleging deceptive trade practices and false advertising. Plaintiffs argue that the company unlawfully overstated the efficacy and health benefits of its three main products: Fruits, Veggies, and Fiber & Spice. These lawsuits highlight the discrepancy between the company's marketing and the scientific evidence supporting the supplements' benefits.

A Registered Dietitian's View: Analyzing the Fruits & Veggies Blend

Beyond the legal turmoil, a nutritional analysis of the product reveals key information that registered dietitians and nutrition experts often point out when evaluating "whole food" supplements.

The Proprietary Blend Problem

Balance of Nature's flagship products—the Fruits and Veggies capsules—contain a proprietary blend of 31 ingredients (16 whole fruits and 15 whole vegetables). While the company touts the extensive list, the use of a proprietary blend means the *exact amount* of each individual fruit or vegetable is not disclosed to the consumer.

Fruits Blend Key Ingredients (16 Whole Fruits):

• Apple
• Banana
• Blueberry
• Cherry
• Cranberry
• Grape
• Grapefruit
• Lemon
• Mango
• Orange
• Papaya
• Pineapple
• Raspberry
• Strawberry
• Tomato
• Aloe Vera

Veggies Blend Key Ingredients (15 Whole Vegetables):

• Broccoli
• Cabbage
• Carrot
• Cauliflower
• Celery
• Kale
• Onion
• Spinach
• Zucchini
• Soybean
• Wheatgrass
• Mushroom
• Sweet Potato
• Yam
• Black Bean

Efficacy vs. Whole Foods

Dietitians often argue that because the specific quantities are unknown, it is impossible to verify if the amount of any single ingredient is high enough to provide the purported health benefits. The total daily serving of six capsules (three Fruits, three Veggies) contains a relatively small amount of total powder. Experts consistently stress that supplements cannot replicate the complex synergy, fiber content, and water volume found in eating whole, fresh produce.

Furthermore, the manufacturing process, which involves flash-drying and encapsulating the produce, can affect the stability and bioavailability of certain heat-sensitive vitamins and phytonutrients.

Final Verdict: Should You Buy Balance of Nature in 2025?

The current landscape surrounding Balance of Nature is dominated by caution. The lack of a specific Mayo Clinic review is less important than the serious, recent legal actions taken by a federal court and the FDA.

The most critical facts for consumers are the court-ordered sales halt and the history of unapproved disease-treatment claims. Until the company demonstrates full compliance with CGMP standards, as required by the federal court, and stops making therapeutic claims, consumers should approach the product with extreme skepticism.

A superior and scientifically supported nutritional strategy remains: prioritize a diet rich in a variety of whole fruits and vegetables, and consult a healthcare professional before relying on any dietary supplement to address a medical condition.